A contractor for JPMorgan Chase changed the front door lock on a Florida resident, Nancy Jacobi. Nancy thought someone was breaking into her home and hid out in the bathroom while dialing 911. She was reportedly three months behind on her mortgage and her home was reportedly in foreclosure, but, according to Eyewitness News, the bank isn't legally allowed to change the locks on an occupied home.

Google "We're not even phased by lawsuits anymore"

Learn more at http://www.democracynow.org/2010/10/12/why_are_bailed_out_banks_breaking

Love to see young entrepreneurs being positive and uplifting communities. Ludacris and his foundation decided to give back by having his own car give-a-way! In Atlanta, Georgia, 20 cars were given away to 20 people winning an writing contest on why they deserved the money.

At a time like this, it even being Labor Day, jobs continue to be lost. It's nice to see those that can give back do just that. Check out his foundation and see how you can get involved or inspired.

Case profile: Chevron lawsuit (re Nigeria)

"In 1999, a group of Nigerians of the Niger Delta region, where Chevron engages in oil production activities, brought a lawsuit against Chevron in US federal court. The plaintiffs allege that they suffered human rights violations, including torture and summary execution, at the hands of the Nigerian military and police acting in concert with Chevron to suppress the plaintiffs’ protests against Chevron’s environmental practices in the Niger Delta. The claims against Chevron are based on two incidents. First, two protestors were shot by Nigerian military and police allegedly recruited by Chevron at its Parabe offshore platform. Second, two Nigerian villages, Opia and Ikenyan, were attacked by Nigerian soldiers using helicopters and boats allegedly leased and/or owned by Chevron, and these attacks allegedly caused the death and injury of a number of villagers. In March of 2007, a federal judge dismissed the federal racketeering claims against Chevron, but the judge declined to dismiss the remaining nine claims made by the plaintiffs. In August of 2007, a federal judge issued a series of decisions regarding Chevron's motions for summary judgment. The judge's orders narrowed the lawsuit,but the plaintiffs' central claims regarding Chevron's complicity in human rights violations were allowed to stand. On 1 December 2008, the federal jury cleared Chevron of the charges in this case. In March 2009, the federal judge denied the plaintiffs' request for a new trial, finding that the evidence presented at trial supported the jury's verdict. The plaintiffs filed an appeal with the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals in April 2009."

Watch 1/4 on homepage.

2/4

Pages: 1 · 2